Elizabeth Manning, Change Management Leader: From Dancer to Change Leader

In this episode, we sit down with Elizabeth Manning , Change Management Leader, to explore her unconventional path from professional dancer to corporate change leader. With a natural talent for dot-connecting and systems thinking, Elizabeth found herself in the rigid, highly regulated world of big pharma—where generalist capabilities were often overlooked. Yet, as she helped leaders navigate complex challenges, her strategic value became undeniable.
Elizabeth’s journey highlights the power of creating your own Catalyst role. Early on, she recognized that having an HR Business Partner who understood her skills and potential was essential to breaking through. She continuously solved problems beyond her formal remit, refining her language to align with the C-suite’s priorities. Eventually, she found an executive sponsor in the Chief Medical Officer, who saw her unique ability to drive strategic transformation and created the perfect Catalyst role for her: Strategic Initiatives Lead—a position designed to tackle the company's biggest, most complex challenges.
Elizabeth’s story is a masterclass in how Catalysts can carve out meaningful roles within organizations by:
- Defining their role in alignment with executive priorities – Clarity in how your work creates business value is key.
- Finding a mentor or sponsor – Someone who understands your strengths and advocates for you when you're not in the room.
- Developing self-awareness of your superpowers – Knowing what sets you apart helps you lean into your strengths.
- Translating your value in a way the organization understands – Speaking the language of leadership makes all the difference.
Join us as Elizabeth shares how she navigated resistance, built strategic alliances, and ultimately shaped a role that allowed her to create a lasting impact. If you’re a Catalyst looking to find your place in a complex organization, this conversation is for you!
Original music by Lynz Floren .
WEBVTT
1
00:00:03.150 --> 00:00:24.260
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: Hi! I'm Shannon Lucas, one of the co-ceos of catalyst constellations which is dedicated to empowering catalyst to create bold, powerful change in the world. This is our podcast move, fast, break ship burnout, where we speak with catalyst leaders about ways to successfully lead transformation and large organizations. And I am thrilled today to have time with Elizabeth Manning. Welcome.
2
00:00:24.400 --> 00:00:26.030
Elizabeth Manning: Thanks, great to be here.
3
00:00:26.750 --> 00:00:35.130
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: Elizabeth is a transformation catalyst who has repeatedly shattered traditional career boundaries, boundaries in the global pharma industry. For 17 years
4
00:00:35.130 --> 00:01:00.090
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: her superpower connecting seemingly unrelated dots with surgical precision and artistic creativity and the relentless pursuit of what's possible. She transforms the most complex challenges into pioneering solutions, fundamentally reshaping team collaboration and industry-wide innovation. Her multidimensional approach blends design thinker with organizational therapists. I loved that framing so much.
5
00:01:00.090 --> 00:01:00.900
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: That's true
6
00:01:00.900 --> 00:01:26.500
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: unleashing potential and leaders and cross functional teams buckle up. Elizabeth doesn't maintain system. She revolutionizes them driving both cultural transformation and business results for the win win. I'm so excited for this conversation today. But let's start off like that's the high level. But we'd love to hear about your journey through the lens of being a catalyst. Maybe some of the things that you're out of that help us see your catalytic nature.
7
00:01:26.850 --> 00:01:35.830
Elizabeth Manning: Yeah, thanks, Shannon. I'm excited to be here very much. So, because, like you said, we have to be able to change the system, so it can work better for us instead of
8
00:01:35.960 --> 00:01:50.859
Elizabeth Manning: Trojan horsing everything like I call it, where you have to sneak in and change without them noticing, like we really need to be able to thrive. So my journey actually started pretty randomly. I was a dancer and choreographer first, st
9
00:01:51.010 --> 00:02:15.389
Elizabeth Manning: and thought that was my career, and I had day jobs. And one of my day jobs was just an administrative role in a pharma company. And while I was there my body decided it wasn't going to be able to dance for long term with my back and my knees collapsing. So I just had to pivot and say, Is there something here that I can make out of this? And I had a conversation with the manager. I was
10
00:02:15.510 --> 00:02:18.300
Elizabeth Manning: overqualified for an admin role. But
11
00:02:18.430 --> 00:02:41.890
Elizabeth Manning: I said, what if I keep adding value? Because I had already started finding new ways and new questions, and you promised to challenge me, and we just see what happens, and he bit every role after that role for 17 years. Every 2 years. Approximately, a new role was created for me out of
12
00:02:41.990 --> 00:02:52.640
Elizabeth Manning: the new value proposition that I was able to discover and then deliver. And then they realized, oh, this is important. So let's institutionalize it. And then I moved on, obviously to the next.
13
00:02:52.920 --> 00:02:57.609
Elizabeth Manning: So I really turned into that go to person through a progression of
14
00:02:58.190 --> 00:03:08.380
Elizabeth Manning: project management type solutions. And then there was a turning point when I was working with a cross functional team who was responsible for
15
00:03:08.590 --> 00:03:14.780
Elizabeth Manning: the largest global epilepsy regulatory submission that had been to date.
16
00:03:15.150 --> 00:03:25.660
Elizabeth Manning: and our chief chief medical officer came to the team and said, You have to accomplish it in half the time. So a 12 month
17
00:03:25.870 --> 00:03:33.849
Elizabeth Manning: usual, which was hard to do anyways, you had to do in 6 months, and yes, Christmas was in there, so
18
00:03:34.370 --> 00:03:38.930
Elizabeth Manning: was in the 6 months. It was impossible. Everyone knew it was impossible.
19
00:03:39.440 --> 00:04:02.159
Elizabeth Manning: I ended up, pulling from design, thinking as kind of alluded to, I pulled from some project management principles. I pulled from my background and interpersonal communications. I pulled from emotional intelligence and really guided that team to a reimagination of all the processes. And I was doing this from a coordinator role. To be clear.
20
00:04:03.370 --> 00:04:18.579
Elizabeth Manning: they reimagine their processes because we open up the safe space for them to switch from a functional escalation model which was much more the traditional specialized. You know, you check with your manager, cut off 5 days. Come back.
21
00:04:19.260 --> 00:04:31.900
Elizabeth Manning: I got them to create a shared accountability approach and got them to feel safe with each other, to brainstorm the what's possible without the limitations of what's realistic yet.
22
00:04:32.220 --> 00:04:45.189
Elizabeth Manning: And when they started doing that and started feeling safe with each other, they came up with solutions that totally changed everything, and we hit the 6 months with one week to spare.
23
00:04:45.190 --> 00:04:45.960
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: Wow!
24
00:04:45.960 --> 00:05:10.260
Elizabeth Manning: Even over the holidays, and that was a huge pivot for me, because there was a lot of visibility, very high profile, and a lot of functions were are involved in that kind of work. So they started to realize they can trust me to guide them towards the impossible. How do we solve when it really does feel impossible. They also saw the necessity
25
00:05:10.420 --> 00:05:12.120
Elizabeth Manning: of reimagination.
26
00:05:12.990 --> 00:05:25.030
Elizabeth Manning: Which then validated the approach I typically come from with questioning things, you know. Is there a different way? How else could we do this. What else could we do with this?
27
00:05:25.560 --> 00:05:33.339
Elizabeth Manning: It used to be annoying now that it delivered this kind of result. Then all of a sudden there was a lot more buy in.
28
00:05:33.430 --> 00:05:57.150
Elizabeth Manning: so that accelerated my growth, and it accelerated me, becoming a go to person when those shifts were needed. So when the industry shifted they would come to me and pair me up with a physician or a Phd. And say, you guys go figure this out. What are we going to do in response to this? Or what's the next move that we need to get ahead of.
29
00:05:57.420 --> 00:06:03.150
Elizabeth Manning: So I did data sharing. I did patient engagement, digital business transformation
30
00:06:03.750 --> 00:06:11.230
Elizabeth Manning: de and I employee engagement and activation. So I ended up in all those spaces as that catalyst
31
00:06:11.350 --> 00:06:15.990
Elizabeth Manning: that helped pull the pieces together that we're never touching
32
00:06:16.210 --> 00:06:36.610
Elizabeth Manning: to see what was slipping through the cracks, and to see the opportunity that could never be realized without bringing those pieces together. The puzzle, the whole puzzle. You know you're missing all the connecting little joints, the little you know, round pieces. It's like this, the cut, the culture had cut those pieces off.
33
00:06:36.890 --> 00:06:41.370
Elizabeth Manning: and they need them to to connect. So people like us see that.
34
00:06:41.660 --> 00:06:46.249
Elizabeth Manning: and have to figure out how to make them see see that.
35
00:06:46.900 --> 00:06:47.630
Elizabeth Manning: But it.
36
00:06:47.630 --> 00:06:48.010
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: Oh!
37
00:06:48.180 --> 00:06:51.438
Elizabeth Manning: Fun, and it was hard. Yeah, all at once.
38
00:06:51.910 --> 00:07:02.379
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: So much to respond to. And thank you for the story. And it really, I think it's such a great example that demonstrates the power of tapping catalyst
39
00:07:02.440 --> 00:07:28.739
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: and the innate skills that they have to solve wicked big problems. And you outlined a number of like the key skills like creating a sense of safety, being able to use your Eq. To manage and bring people along, and all of that stuff. We could spend a whole conversation talking about that. But what is super interesting is about like the personal branding that you got known for, and the fact that you kept having to sort of like
40
00:07:28.740 --> 00:07:52.010
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: articulate or pitch your next role, or great great clarity about like how in this next problem, solving where you were, gonna sit in the organization and what that looked like. And you know, I remember when my, when my, when I got picked to do the you know the innovation program, my boss was like this. It might have a 2 year lifespan like you. You might not have a job after this. Do you want to do this crazy thing, and I was like, Yes, please.
41
00:07:53.035 --> 00:08:09.479
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: but for me I didn't have to create that role subsequently I did. But it's something that I think more more catalysts should think about is like helping companies understand the value and actually pitching how they can best help. So how did you do that? I mean, I hear you also got results. So like, let's not forget that part.
42
00:08:09.872 --> 00:08:31.849
Elizabeth Manning: Well, and I think that is actually it's a laughable, but it is a key element of it. It's also a key risk that, looking back on it, I make sure people are aware of when they're hearing my story, because one of the problems for me was that I was always solving a new problem.
43
00:08:32.010 --> 00:08:34.410
Elizabeth Manning: Then the role was created.
44
00:08:35.210 --> 00:08:45.699
Elizabeth Manning: So what happened was, at 1st I was like, this is awesome. I'm getting rewarded for what I've accomplished. But at a certain level, when I should have been
45
00:08:45.940 --> 00:08:55.970
Elizabeth Manning: 2 levels higher in terms of organizational. The types of decisions I'm making the types of, you know, executive thinking and and activities that I was managing.
46
00:08:56.490 --> 00:09:12.529
Elizabeth Manning: I wasn't able to get there because the policies in the organization were that you can't jump more than 2 levels at any given promotion, and you can only get promoted on these cycles and blah blah blah! At the end of the day I never fully recalibrated
47
00:09:12.530 --> 00:09:29.510
Elizabeth Manning: to where I actually deserved to be in terms of pay grade in terms of level of authority and decision, making responsibilities that matched up. So I want to make sure. That's clear as a risk for this approach. But one of the key aspects was
48
00:09:29.680 --> 00:09:32.280
Elizabeth Manning: create, and I didn't realize this at the time
49
00:09:32.600 --> 00:09:36.750
Elizabeth Manning: getting an advocate in Hr. And visibility
50
00:09:36.910 --> 00:09:41.670
Elizabeth Manning: with Hr. Particularly to one, the benefits person
51
00:09:42.230 --> 00:09:49.360
Elizabeth Manning: and to just someone that is your lead at the site that can see you
52
00:09:49.950 --> 00:10:01.550
Elizabeth Manning: visibly in the space locally, but also start seeing you globally and realizing that that's different than the typical. Whatever your role usually is.
53
00:10:01.550 --> 00:10:02.040
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: Hmm.
54
00:10:02.040 --> 00:10:08.589
Elizabeth Manning: But really it was the benefits person that kicked the whole journey off, because she told me.
55
00:10:08.920 --> 00:10:13.989
Elizabeth Manning: we need to reassess your role at this point, because what I'm seeing you do
56
00:10:14.220 --> 00:10:18.899
Elizabeth Manning: is far beyond what is appropriate within an admin role.
57
00:10:19.330 --> 00:10:41.340
Elizabeth Manning: So she started the process of assessing. She said, write out everything you do, which, of course, is the most daunting thing to ask one like us to do. It's like, just forget it. I'll quit. But I did it. And that started the process of us being able to create a new role. And that's 1 of the things I'm proudest of, because that role actually did get institutionalized.
58
00:10:41.340 --> 00:10:41.710
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: Thanks.
59
00:10:41.720 --> 00:10:53.149
Elizabeth Manning: 1st role was the missing piece for non-traditional generalist type of talent. Within a hugely specialized organization there was 0 career path
60
00:10:53.410 --> 00:11:08.159
Elizabeth Manning: for anyone that wasn't a scientist, a physician, a data. You know it very structured functions. This created the first.st So office managers started getting career paths and administrative assistants. And we created this
61
00:11:08.270 --> 00:11:20.089
Elizabeth Manning: project management type of role that was outside of the study project manager and that created career paths for people in all different directions in the organization, and it still exists.
62
00:11:20.190 --> 00:11:30.679
Elizabeth Manning: But it also inspired specialists, which I thought was one of the coolest things for me. When people there experts world experts, you know, coming and saying
63
00:11:31.670 --> 00:11:35.520
Elizabeth Manning: you're inspiring me because I never would have thought to connect
64
00:11:36.120 --> 00:12:01.899
Elizabeth Manning: this with that. And I'm really passionate about that. I'm kind of curious about that. I didn't realize there could be an opportunity for me to explore that. And so they saw it getting done. And so I was then coaching. You know, people 4 levels up for me, just brainstorming. How they could put different pieces of their skill sets and their passions together to see what new value they could offer. And so that grew. But
65
00:12:02.090 --> 00:12:24.729
Elizabeth Manning: that was the initial process. And then from there it was the okay. You solved this problem. You evolved it, and then you get to the end of the year. You try to do your end of your reviews, none of your objectives from the beginning match. What you actually did. How do we solve this? Oh, we create a new role. So that was what happened for
66
00:12:25.330 --> 00:12:31.199
Elizabeth Manning: probably 3 or 4 rounds of the evolution, until finally, at the end, the
67
00:12:31.350 --> 00:12:37.480
Elizabeth Manning: the person that had really been sponsoring me in essence the whole time kind of said, I need you to do
68
00:12:37.960 --> 00:12:47.161
Elizabeth Manning: change for the digital business transformation, the board reporting the this, the that I'm just gonna call it strategic initiatives lead. So we can stop.
69
00:12:47.820 --> 00:13:03.120
Elizabeth Manning: That was where I landed and partnered with the Executive Committee, partnered with steering committees, advised, created a whole training structure for other change. Managers developed, you know, different infrastructure. So
70
00:13:03.240 --> 00:13:09.829
Elizabeth Manning: that worked the best, and I would make that recommendation to anyone trying to do it, to go ahead and think
71
00:13:10.140 --> 00:13:17.470
Elizabeth Manning: generally, once you've established yourself as that go to, because then they they can actually see the necessity for
72
00:13:17.830 --> 00:13:20.239
Elizabeth Manning: the diversity within a role.
73
00:13:20.430 --> 00:13:22.959
Elizabeth Manning: And then you can create specific
74
00:13:23.200 --> 00:13:25.560
Elizabeth Manning: actions and and measures for it.
75
00:13:28.400 --> 00:13:56.250
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: So much to respond to strategic initiatives. Lead is so fascinating because it's like, instead of let me see if I if I have this right just for clarification, instead of creating, like the role for each project that is, then time bound, and all of that there was a recognition that, having this generalist, with all of the skills that you articulated as like a a resource that the organization can tap into for subsequent strategic initiatives
76
00:13:56.250 --> 00:13:59.179
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: was a Epiphany for them. Is that is that what I heard.
77
00:13:59.380 --> 00:14:08.360
Elizabeth Manning: Very much so. And I became that person then enterprise, level risk management. You're our represent anything that was in that cross, functional
78
00:14:08.620 --> 00:14:30.299
Elizabeth Manning: cross, disciplinary space. I was then the perfect person for that, and I partnered well with the Chief of Staff for the organization that my position actually sat within. So it was also really helpful for that person who's in charge of kind of seeing what's going on, but never has the bandwidth to actually drive the strategy for it all.
79
00:14:30.680 --> 00:14:41.530
Elizabeth Manning: So it was a good way of flow insights from other groups, insights to other groups. And then, for instance, in the risk management.
80
00:14:42.590 --> 00:14:47.209
Elizabeth Manning: I joined that committee, Shannon and I sat there in the 1st meeting and said.
81
00:14:48.570 --> 00:14:55.299
Elizabeth Manning: I think this is the 1st time where I might be saying, Who is this? Why am I? Why are you at the table?
82
00:14:55.300 --> 00:14:55.750
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: I'm kidding.
83
00:14:55.750 --> 00:15:00.210
Elizabeth Manning: The level of specialization that they were talking about.
84
00:15:00.210 --> 00:15:00.910
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: Yeah.
85
00:15:01.560 --> 00:15:07.808
Elizabeth Manning: I had not been exposed to, nor honestly did I want to be
86
00:15:09.340 --> 00:15:16.100
Elizabeth Manning: to to the depth that I was hearing about it. So I started, say, asking questions. I can't
87
00:15:16.360 --> 00:15:23.219
Elizabeth Manning: get into the weeds of what you're talking about, but what I'm seeing is.
88
00:15:24.350 --> 00:15:29.450
Elizabeth Manning: where's the connection between this and this? You seem like you're talking about the same thing.
89
00:15:29.770 --> 00:15:42.959
Elizabeth Manning: you know, and when we talk about a trial, why, only one function has it. But then 3 other functions are seemingly replicating that because it's also a risk in technology, it's also a risk in it.
90
00:15:43.480 --> 00:15:56.970
Elizabeth Manning: So I ended up being that person that at 1st I thought I was way out of my league and ended up being the one that was the most visionary, and helped them really rethink about risk management at an enterprise level.
91
00:15:56.970 --> 00:15:59.080
Elizabeth Manning: That's right. So it's totally abort.
92
00:15:59.470 --> 00:16:15.310
Elizabeth Manning: Yeah, we totally went away from the functional only risks, and decided this committee was really for that enterprise level. How do we redefine those so that we can work together towards the same objective so that we can mitigate and inform? And
93
00:16:15.920 --> 00:16:31.649
Elizabeth Manning: yeah, it was crazy. So for me, I was like, this is obvious. Why are you? Why are you not doing it? But ended up positioning me as a really important strategic leader on that organization. Because again, they're all from that functional, specialized
94
00:16:31.760 --> 00:16:40.690
Elizabeth Manning: traditional model. They're amazing in their own rights and in that specialization. But the the systems, thinking beyond their function
95
00:16:41.000 --> 00:16:47.079
Elizabeth Manning: was one not normal and 2. They honestly didn't have the privilege.
96
00:16:47.270 --> 00:16:50.209
Elizabeth Manning: the luxury of being able to think
97
00:16:50.710 --> 00:16:53.560
Elizabeth Manning: about everybody else. You know, it's just.
98
00:16:53.560 --> 00:16:53.930
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: Yeah.
99
00:16:53.930 --> 00:16:58.479
Elizabeth Manning: So much, and it's not right to expect every
100
00:16:58.800 --> 00:17:07.740
Elizabeth Manning: leader to be able to see everything. So I really think the partnership model and the collaborative model that catalyst typically bring is an advantage, not.
101
00:17:08.020 --> 00:17:12.669
Elizabeth Manning: you know, just a Band-aid. I think it's a that's a good model of partnering.
102
00:17:13.109 --> 00:17:14.649
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: Totally agree.
103
00:17:15.879 --> 00:17:20.389
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: the I'm gonna recap a little bit. And then I have some specific follow ups I wanna
104
00:17:20.539 --> 00:17:47.439
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: talk about. But so the one of the things that we're talking about right now is the difference between when people think about organizational structures like the old model is like you'd have an org structure, and you'd build it in concrete and cement. And it was like, you know, that would that would be the way that the organization was supposed to work for the next 3 to 5 years strategic cycle, or whatever. And the way that we're thinking about it now is actually you have to have Legos. It's a Lego structure, because you have to be able to. And this is what sounds like you do is like, pick up pieces of these
105
00:17:47.479 --> 00:17:56.129
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: skill sets and the cross functional teams. And like, Okay, we're gonna pull these Legos over here now to solve this problem. And then you go back and and have that agility.
106
00:17:56.754 --> 00:18:19.119
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: There's some interesting questions there, though, or some challenges that I'm guessing you encountered, one is, how do we articulate value? And this is a challenge we know that catalysts have because we are both the convener. So it often feels inauthentic to be like. And this team created a billion dollar product. And you're like all I did was facilitate right.
107
00:18:19.119 --> 00:18:43.979
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: And we're often so in service of it that it feels disingenuous to even talk about the value, or it happened after we left. So like one is, how did you articulate the value? The next is connected to that like, how do you find executive sponsors who, especially in kind of maybe cement operating silos right now understand that value and and can advocate for it. And the 3rd one you talked about a little bit is like the impossible
108
00:18:43.979 --> 00:18:56.899
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: syndrome. Like as we're creating these new roles or getting pulled into new roles where we don't have the domain expertise. And actually, the value is as a generalist. But like, I'm guessing the risk people at the beginning, you know, you're like, I don't know about risk. And they're like, we don't know about you.
109
00:18:58.684 --> 00:19:08.109
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: So those are 3 things I'd like you to unpack, because I think that this is a like. It's a real ambition for catalyst to be able to do what you did. But I'm that there were challenges in those areas along the way.
110
00:19:08.480 --> 00:19:22.340
Elizabeth Manning: I'll start from the last, and then I'll ask you to remind me the other 2, I think, with the risk one, and to clarify it. I was coming in as the representative for all of clinical development. So if anyone knows anything about
111
00:19:22.540 --> 00:19:34.980
Elizabeth Manning: research, clinical development is huge and hugely regulated, it's everything has to be systematic, repetitive, repeatable, all of that. And so here I am.
112
00:19:35.150 --> 00:19:48.979
Elizabeth Manning: the dancer, the creative, the all of that representing that group which was an interesting evolution, anyways, but it does speak to where that sponsor. So I'll tease that answer where that sponsor was visionary in and of herself
113
00:19:49.700 --> 00:19:53.630
Elizabeth Manning: to latch on to me as the representative of that part of the group.
114
00:19:54.370 --> 00:20:07.480
Elizabeth Manning: So within that space, how did that happen? I think what's really big on the imposter syndrome for me is when I went to Hr. And I could get the paper that said
115
00:20:07.610 --> 00:20:18.100
Elizabeth Manning: here because they have it. They have an outline of the types of accountability, the types of responsibility, the types of competency that mirror every grade level.
116
00:20:18.480 --> 00:20:25.039
Elizabeth Manning: And when I got that and was able to review it and see. Oh, wait!
117
00:20:25.380 --> 00:20:31.550
Elizabeth Manning: I am! I'm doing this. I'm not doing support help.
118
00:20:31.700 --> 00:20:41.829
Elizabeth Manning: you know. Follow on, follow up edit I was creating, and I was guiding, and I was facilitating, and I was challenging, and
119
00:20:42.540 --> 00:20:52.169
Elizabeth Manning: I was getting the important conversations to be had. I was finding the root causes that were actually the problems and avoiding us, you know, spending time in the symptoms. So
120
00:20:52.290 --> 00:20:55.540
Elizabeth Manning: that really helped me get the arsenal.
121
00:20:55.770 --> 00:21:02.729
Elizabeth Manning: The other thing that was outside of the company. I had a mentor that told me you're a rock in their shoe.
122
00:21:03.010 --> 00:21:07.129
Elizabeth Manning: and they don't want to rock in their shoe, so you just need to know that.
123
00:21:07.530 --> 00:21:12.230
Elizabeth Manning: And I thought, I'm gonna prove them wrong, and I didn't prove it wrong.
124
00:21:13.740 --> 00:21:20.169
Elizabeth Manning: and they didn't most didn't want to rock in their shoe. But I was a good one, so.
125
00:21:20.525 --> 00:21:20.880
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: Awesome.
126
00:21:20.880 --> 00:21:42.459
Elizabeth Manning: I think part of that was, he suggested. I take the strength finder, which was the 1.0 at the time, but that also helped me a lot, because it really gave language that I could feel substantiated what I bring in a professional setting, especially as a dancer and a communications background. You know, those were things that aren't hugely
127
00:21:42.590 --> 00:22:00.940
Elizabeth Manning: thought of as respectable in a pharma space. So it really helped me start to see. Okay, intuition is an actual skill. I can say that out loud. I can say my intuition is one of the, you know, strong suits rather than trying to dance around it because of fear that people see it as too fluffy.
128
00:22:00.940 --> 00:22:01.420
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: Right.
129
00:22:01.420 --> 00:22:04.059
Elizabeth Manning: But, like you said, when you can combine that with
130
00:22:04.810 --> 00:22:09.230
Elizabeth Manning: the conversation you are able to help, people have, they see it.
131
00:22:09.610 --> 00:22:12.750
Elizabeth Manning: and when you see them see it? You realize, okay.
132
00:22:13.140 --> 00:22:13.950
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: The value.
133
00:22:13.950 --> 00:22:14.979
Elizabeth Manning: Actually doing that like.
134
00:22:14.980 --> 00:22:15.820
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: Yeah. Totally.
135
00:22:15.820 --> 00:22:17.170
Elizabeth Manning: This is legit.
136
00:22:17.690 --> 00:22:22.849
Elizabeth Manning: They're shifting. So yeah, that that really helps. So I would say.
137
00:22:22.950 --> 00:22:37.369
Elizabeth Manning: really getting that hr, like, I said at the beginning. You know that that Hr. Partner? I like. I said it was not intentional. I didn't realize it until looking back, but those were key advantages. Having that relationship.
138
00:22:37.640 --> 00:22:47.608
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: Yeah. So we're repeating that back role clarity, which even if it's like the not tech, not the hard tech skills, but like what you are supposed to be doing.
139
00:22:47.920 --> 00:23:12.920
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: having a mentor who can help you see what your role is for, better or worse, and being able to embrace that sort of the self-awareness and the self evaluation. Like, you know, the strength finder is a super good one, but it's like, what are my superpowers, and then how do you? And we work with catalysts a lot. We're teaching a class on this in a couple of weeks, like, how do you create a personal brand and articulate your value as a catalyst, because if you can understand how other people are articulated.
140
00:23:12.920 --> 00:23:25.750
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: your value when you're not in the room, that's a great thing for you to be able to do so. Those are the 2 starting points that I had like. How did you articulate your value? And how did your maybe? How did you find an exec sponsor? And how did they articulate your value.
141
00:23:25.900 --> 00:23:26.530
Elizabeth Manning: Yeah.
142
00:23:26.910 --> 00:23:43.319
Elizabeth Manning: A big pivot was one year I was invited to the leadership Forum, which was the executive Committee, and then the N minus ones globally. That's they came together once a year to really hone in on the strategies, the key objectives that kind of thing. For the next year.
143
00:23:43.770 --> 00:24:04.690
Elizabeth Manning: Every year they invited different people as representatives of different themes, that they were, gonna be focused on that year. They invited people, they thought, were solid representatives of the culture they want to evolve into, and how bringing that culture to life really looks versus, you know, the slide sets and and all of that. And speaking of work.
144
00:24:04.870 --> 00:24:08.490
Elizabeth Manning: so I was one of the few that came for that purpose.
145
00:24:08.890 --> 00:24:11.250
Elizabeth Manning: But what it did for me
146
00:24:11.690 --> 00:24:16.770
Elizabeth Manning: having access to that conversation was a game changer.
147
00:24:16.770 --> 00:24:17.580
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: Hmm.
148
00:24:17.580 --> 00:24:22.129
Elizabeth Manning: When I could hear how they at that level
149
00:24:22.360 --> 00:24:36.090
Elizabeth Manning: really talked about things and what was really important, and what questions they were really digging into, and what they were kind of not digging into and then seeing them define
150
00:24:36.200 --> 00:24:39.280
Elizabeth Manning: what they expect as outcomes to things.
151
00:24:39.440 --> 00:24:56.490
Elizabeth Manning: That was a game changer for me. I went from driving everyone crazy. That managed me with a 12 page year End review, because I had to explain every little thing and its value, because no one really understood, like we were talking about
152
00:24:56.650 --> 00:25:13.950
Elizabeth Manning: to the most concise one I ever had, and my manager going. What in the world happened. This is the best thing I've ever seen. I know exactly what what you're doing. This is exactly how we can build on it, you know. So, being able to find access
153
00:25:14.140 --> 00:25:25.980
Elizabeth Manning: to those conversations and really hear what's being said and how the conversations are going. Was huge for me. Because then I was like, Okay, I can see this. I can hear this. I know what it's really saying.
154
00:25:26.380 --> 00:25:35.050
Elizabeth Manning: Now I know I can tap directly all the way to what they're exact. That level is expecting as an output. And I know how I can impact that.
155
00:25:35.050 --> 00:25:38.476
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: That's right. And I think what happens to us is we
156
00:25:39.420 --> 00:25:42.719
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: the signals that we get from organizations.
157
00:25:43.180 --> 00:26:08.139
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: especially earlier in our careers. We might be showing up, as the really unfriendly rock in the shoe is, stay to the side like we might want what you have. But it's this special project or this thing here. But really, what we talked to catalyst about is, you need to understand what the top 3 initiatives are for the organization and not be peripheral and peripheral, and align your value, and what you're doing to how you're going to help them solve their top 3
158
00:26:08.140 --> 00:26:14.840
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: initiatives, or whatever I'd love for you to talk a little bit, because I know you experienced that on the on the journey.
159
00:26:15.400 --> 00:26:42.400
Elizabeth Manning: Definitely and especially with my journey, being as a dancer and and communications person. So what I saw as important was not what other people saw as important, and what they saw as important I saw is ridiculous for the longest time. So that year in conversation was really painful. A lot of the time until I started to realize, like, you're saying, how what I'm doing actually does drive the outcomes.
160
00:26:42.560 --> 00:26:46.370
Elizabeth Manning: So that took me being very curious.
161
00:26:46.610 --> 00:26:47.200
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: Hmm.
162
00:26:47.200 --> 00:26:48.100
Elizabeth Manning: And
163
00:26:48.960 --> 00:27:04.890
Elizabeth Manning: looking at that, not as something I resented because I did. I resented measurement. I resented Kpis all of that because I was such a people person. I am such a people person, but I had to realize what the utility of it is.
164
00:27:05.180 --> 00:27:07.480
Elizabeth Manning: and why they need that.
165
00:27:07.800 --> 00:27:10.990
Elizabeth Manning: And when you can see the the pressures
166
00:27:11.420 --> 00:27:14.680
Elizabeth Manning: on the leaders that you're trying to influence.
167
00:27:14.680 --> 00:27:16.780
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: The empathy? Totally. Yeah.
168
00:27:16.780 --> 00:27:24.100
Elizabeth Manning: And so then it really is still your same skill of empathy. But you're realizing, what are they getting pinned to the wall for?
169
00:27:24.100 --> 00:27:24.920
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: Totally.
170
00:27:24.920 --> 00:27:36.470
Elizabeth Manning: And how much are they trying to manage? And so that's a twofold learning for me, one. How to find what, how to help them do what's most frustrating, what they can't figure out.
171
00:27:36.470 --> 00:27:36.900
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: That's right.
172
00:27:37.167 --> 00:27:49.220
Elizabeth Manning: And that was my strategy at every level. I would say, you know, there's a lot of articles out there of how to do this, and I think the one Achilles heel to them is that they all say, ask someone how you can help.
173
00:27:49.440 --> 00:27:50.090
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: Yep.
174
00:27:50.450 --> 00:27:53.880
Elizabeth Manning: That's not a good question, because they don't know how you.
175
00:27:53.880 --> 00:27:55.260
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: No, totally yep.
176
00:27:55.260 --> 00:28:03.129
Elizabeth Manning: And they'll say you can go file this, you can go copy that. And I had one that I had to stroke his ego, and I was filing his
177
00:28:03.300 --> 00:28:08.590
Elizabeth Manning: his publications in his binder. Okay, fine. But over here
178
00:28:08.740 --> 00:28:19.229
Elizabeth Manning: I saw this other physician who was frustrated and time bogged down, looking through listings and listings, and I asked him, What are you looking for?
179
00:28:19.640 --> 00:28:22.680
Elizabeth Manning: It's like I have to find every fall
180
00:28:22.910 --> 00:28:30.970
Elizabeth Manning: like a fall, as an as an event that happened, and then I have to look to see if this is in the range of this and this, and I have to highlight it.
181
00:28:31.850 --> 00:28:33.300
Elizabeth Manning: And I said.
182
00:28:33.800 --> 00:28:43.059
Elizabeth Manning: Hey, lead physician on this huge global project. You probably have other things that are very aligned to what only a physician can do.
183
00:28:43.550 --> 00:28:55.900
Elizabeth Manning: Why are you doing it that way? Well, this is how I have to do it. I have to go through. So I found his frustration point. I understood. I got curious to find out what is really, what do you have to achieve?
184
00:28:56.640 --> 00:28:58.060
Elizabeth Manning: And then I went
185
00:28:58.160 --> 00:29:04.789
Elizabeth Manning: and talk to other people without him knowing. I went to the programmer. I went to the Stat programmer, the statistician, and said, Hey.
186
00:29:05.130 --> 00:29:11.909
Elizabeth Manning: is there really not a way we can reprogram this list to already have this parameter and this. And she was like.
187
00:29:12.040 --> 00:29:13.639
Elizabeth Manning: Yeah, I think I can.
188
00:29:14.000 --> 00:29:22.700
Elizabeth Manning: Can you try that? So we did. It gave it to him. Voila! He's got all the time, and then I was a strategic partner. Then I helped
189
00:29:23.320 --> 00:29:23.970
Elizabeth Manning: that report.
190
00:29:24.665 --> 00:29:25.360
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: Totally.
191
00:29:25.360 --> 00:29:29.499
Elizabeth Manning: What was the meat of his, you know. So I think those kind of
192
00:29:29.880 --> 00:29:35.739
Elizabeth Manning: really getting curious to figure out what they're accountable for, what's frustrating them, what they can't solve.
193
00:29:35.970 --> 00:29:37.990
Elizabeth Manning: and then, finding
194
00:29:38.430 --> 00:29:46.719
Elizabeth Manning: the channels to to go look for what's the best way? Is there a way to solve this rather than say he would have never.
195
00:29:47.104 --> 00:29:52.265
Elizabeth Manning: when I did say, How can I help? He said, well, you can go highlight. All these word falls when you see it.
196
00:29:52.490 --> 00:30:21.300
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: Right? Oh, yeah, totally. And I love that example. Not I mean, not that that's not strategic, but it might not be solving the whole big initiative that he was doing. But like, when we teach the class, one of the things that we teach is like as you're bringing people along on the journey, you have to demonstrate credibility and impact. And so, like the ability to listen the empathy and solve a what feels like to them. A large problem right in the moment, and a small problem. And then you're given the sort of keys to the kingdom. So.
197
00:30:21.300 --> 00:30:23.600
Elizabeth Manning: Seeing the pieces to know.
198
00:30:24.140 --> 00:30:34.030
Elizabeth Manning: Here's the thought process that makes it strategic. I saw the lead physician not having enough time to do what everyone needed from him.
199
00:30:34.030 --> 00:30:34.850
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: Totally.
200
00:30:34.850 --> 00:30:45.949
Elizabeth Manning: The whole effort of hitting this 6 month in a 12 month work in 6 months time, all the other bottlenecks from that person not being able to hit it.
201
00:30:46.340 --> 00:30:58.600
Elizabeth Manning: the weight on him so he wasn't showing up at his best. The relationships between those other people was strange. So it's seeing the impact of all of that on this. We've got to hit this in 6 months.
202
00:30:58.600 --> 00:30:59.270
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: That's a great example.
203
00:30:59.270 --> 00:31:07.789
Elizabeth Manning: Not let me look at that paper and figure out how to make this small task better. Yes, I did that. But the the systems, thinking behind it.
204
00:31:07.790 --> 00:31:08.460
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: That's right.
205
00:31:08.460 --> 00:31:26.340
Elizabeth Manning: Was that that's a route pro. There is a critical path. This is limiting the critical path. This solution can fix that, and it will peripherally ex accelerate the other things, because they will be showing up in a better headspace with, you know, more focused energy where they need to be, and all of that. So
206
00:31:26.640 --> 00:31:30.020
Elizabeth Manning: they didn't even see it strategically, like I was seeing it so really.
207
00:31:30.020 --> 00:31:30.430
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: Totally.
208
00:31:30.430 --> 00:31:39.879
Elizabeth Manning: Was looking at more strategic than they were. And then that was a replicable solution for all the future submissions as well. So yeah.
209
00:31:39.880 --> 00:31:53.930
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: I was. Gonna say, it gets people thinking differently about how they can do the problem solving, too, like you don't have to be in the room to unlock all of those other things they're like, oh, if we had just looked at it this way, we could have solved bigger problems or other.
210
00:31:53.930 --> 00:31:58.050
Elizabeth Manning: Like coaching for the statisticians to even see themselves differently.
211
00:31:58.160 --> 00:32:05.869
Elizabeth Manning: to not see themselves as transactional. You know. You tell me what you need as the listing. I'll give the output with no thinking as to
212
00:32:06.490 --> 00:32:10.950
Elizabeth Manning: what's that supposed to be accomplishing? Can I do something for you better?
213
00:32:11.080 --> 00:32:20.399
Elizabeth Manning: And through that experience those statisticians and those statistical programmers and the, you know, the Peripheral Service Internal Service providers
214
00:32:20.630 --> 00:32:30.310
Elizabeth Manning: started shifting from a transactional. Okay, I'll just do what they asked to understanding what was needed, and how they could deliver something better.
215
00:32:30.310 --> 00:32:31.050
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: Yeah.
216
00:32:31.050 --> 00:32:36.563
Elizabeth Manning: Elevate, it elevates all the organizations. So ripple effects is how I measure.
217
00:32:36.940 --> 00:32:37.590
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: Yes.
218
00:32:37.590 --> 00:32:39.270
Elizabeth Manning: That never worked. At the end of the year.
219
00:32:40.500 --> 00:32:51.150
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: That leadership Forum was so important. I always was, you know. You'll never see the end of the ripple, but it is cool when you can see it over at least a
220
00:32:51.150 --> 00:32:56.140
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: of working that are disseminating across the organization and causing, you know, creating efficiencies totally.
221
00:32:56.140 --> 00:32:57.410
Elizabeth Manning: Sticking.
222
00:32:57.410 --> 00:33:07.459
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: That's right. That's right. Because people like see the impact, which is, you know, super powerful for people, because it's solving something for them, too. They can go to their boss and be like, here's here's what I did for the business.
223
00:33:07.460 --> 00:33:08.300
Elizabeth Manning: Yeah, yeah.
224
00:33:08.300 --> 00:33:17.119
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: All right as we come to a close. I would love to ask you about who your favorite inspirational catalyst is, past or present, and why.
225
00:33:17.320 --> 00:33:24.970
Elizabeth Manning: Yeah. And I think you had wanted me to talk about mentors, and we didn't get necessarily to that. I think I will speak to it briefly, because
226
00:33:25.080 --> 00:33:29.650
Elizabeth Manning: for me the strategy for mentors was never overt. It was
227
00:33:30.200 --> 00:33:36.189
Elizabeth Manning: tapping into who I saw as effective challengers
228
00:33:36.430 --> 00:33:46.089
Elizabeth Manning: and getting curious, just reaching out, What are you doing? What is your work, you know? And then saying, Oh, I see the connection here. Have you ever thought of that? And then
229
00:33:46.200 --> 00:33:53.960
Elizabeth Manning: those types of people like having partners, but they don't have the time or energy to look for them. So when you can bring yourself
230
00:33:54.140 --> 00:33:57.909
Elizabeth Manning: to them. And then sometimes they did come to me like
231
00:33:58.080 --> 00:34:01.610
Elizabeth Manning: my the Cmo. That ultimately helped me.
232
00:34:02.240 --> 00:34:12.560
Elizabeth Manning: She said that she noticed me constantly asking the right questions, good questions that led to solutions, whereas the majority of her people
233
00:34:12.960 --> 00:34:16.649
Elizabeth Manning: look for the solutions and are trying to come up with answers.
234
00:34:16.650 --> 00:34:17.210
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: Yeah.
235
00:34:17.219 --> 00:34:20.349
Elizabeth Manning: Do, at least because she's innovative enough herself.
236
00:34:20.599 --> 00:34:26.289
Elizabeth Manning: She knew at least that that was a big difference that was really important to be as innovative as she wanted to be.
237
00:34:26.539 --> 00:34:34.219
Elizabeth Manning: So that was a way that she ended up, starting to trust me before I realized I was on the radar kind of thing.
238
00:34:34.219 --> 00:34:47.129
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: That's that's that's amazing. And it's a super important point. Because, as we're especially as we're thinking about carving our own path through organizations, having someone at the C-suite who understands the value that you're bringing. That's not afraid of the ripples
239
00:34:47.129 --> 00:35:05.816
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: that you're creating potentially, and can be that voice in the room. That's both, you know, talking about you when you're not in the room, but talking about your value when you're not in the room. I think that's super important. And it's like, you know, if you if if after a while, as a catalyst, you can't find that executive sponsor in your organization, I think it's a good moment for that sort of strategic pause and be like.
240
00:35:06.049 --> 00:35:08.849
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: what does that mean for my future? Here? Yeah, thanks. Thanks.
241
00:35:08.850 --> 00:35:16.149
Elizabeth Manning: Because I'll say she is actually the person. That is the answer for your your roundup question of who is the.
242
00:35:16.360 --> 00:35:17.040
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: Amazing.
243
00:35:17.040 --> 00:35:29.830
Elizabeth Manning: It's really because I know so clearly that it would have never all of that. All this evolution in my own life, and my own thinking and my own learning. I saw the world I
244
00:35:30.220 --> 00:35:51.400
Elizabeth Manning: trained in Japan, you know, all these different things would never be possible if she hadn't seen something, and she hadn't herself been a innovator at heart, and just not know how to get the organization to do what she knew could be done. So she saw me as a person that could help get
245
00:35:51.940 --> 00:35:59.560
Elizabeth Manning: the you know, the connection between A and B, where? Where? She saw B very clearly and struggled with the connection. Iris Low, Friedrich.
246
00:35:59.560 --> 00:36:01.789
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: Okay, we'll put a link to her and.
247
00:36:01.790 --> 00:36:02.890
Elizabeth Manning: Yeah, for sure.
248
00:36:03.280 --> 00:36:25.448
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: And maybe have conversation round 2 to get the 2 perspectives about what that looks like, you know, for the executives who are like, you know, catalyst executives that are out there, even catalyst allies and be like. Look if you can find and support even one of these people in your organization. Look at the impact that it can have. Imagine having a cohort of 30.
249
00:36:25.770 --> 00:36:46.169
Elizabeth Manning: And she did. She had to go for bat for me a lot, because you make people uncomfortable, and and especially leaders. I was able to get the broader organization to go bold, much better than leaders were willing to. And really, yeah, she she was willing to defend her vision and my ability to help get us to her vision.
250
00:36:46.360 --> 00:36:49.640
Elizabeth Manning: So she was also able to educate me on when
251
00:36:50.370 --> 00:36:59.149
Elizabeth Manning: I needed to start pulling back. And that's something that reflective after being there. That's 1 of my personal key learnings is that
252
00:36:59.270 --> 00:37:03.670
Elizabeth Manning: I felt so much pressure because of I was in this isolated role.
253
00:37:03.860 --> 00:37:04.410
Elizabeth Manning: Yeah.
254
00:37:04.410 --> 00:37:15.970
Elizabeth Manning: still organizationally supported. So I went hard, hard to try to deliver the value. I knew I could, because I thought I was, you know, so much at risk being isolated. So
255
00:37:16.080 --> 00:37:24.660
Elizabeth Manning: there's there's a lot that happens there, whereas now I realize I should have given them more grace. Not that I should have quit because I always struggled with the you should let it go.
256
00:37:25.010 --> 00:37:29.570
Elizabeth Manning: That was the worst thing, but now I see it as you should.
257
00:37:30.170 --> 00:37:38.339
Elizabeth Manning: But now that you can see what they're facing and what they're up against. You can better understand where they're coming from. So yeah, I think.
258
00:37:38.340 --> 00:37:39.350
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: Super fine line.
259
00:37:39.350 --> 00:37:40.240
Elizabeth Manning: Critical.
260
00:37:40.240 --> 00:37:57.140
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: Yeah, we we talk about it in class. It's a super fine line between the driving and the empathy and the bringing people along. So also self compassion for yourself, like you were on your own journey, and we do the best that we can and drive is something that organizations profit from, you know. So
261
00:37:57.320 --> 00:38:07.058
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: yeah, Elizabeth, thank you. This was such an amazing conversation to all of the generalists and catalysts out there. It is possible to carve your own pathway.
262
00:38:08.200 --> 00:38:16.780
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: and and again, a good idea, because you get clarity on what you're, you know, an alignment on what you're bringing to the organization. So thank you again for being part.
263
00:38:16.780 --> 00:38:19.149
Elizabeth Manning: Thanks for having me.
264
00:38:19.550 --> 00:38:45.969
Shannon Lucas - Catalyst Constellations: And to our listening audience. Thank you so much for listening. If you'd like to learn more about how to create bold, powerful change in the world. Be sure to check out our book, move fast, break, shit, burn out, or go to our website at catalystconstellations.com. If you enjoyed this episode, please take 10 seconds to rate it on itunes, spotify stitcher, or wherever you listen to your podcasts and of course. If you have other catalysts or generalists in your life, hit the share button and send a link their way. Thanks again.